ɫƵ

Our Land Rights

How Our Historic Land Claims Relate to ANCSA Section 17(d)(1)

Storyknife, Mar/Apr 2024 edition

On June 1, 1972, the ɫƵ Corporation incorporators attended a ceremony in Washington, D.C. to approve the creation of ɫƵ and two other regional corporations. One of ɫƵ’s top priorities was selecting lands. Pictured left to right: Assistant Secretary of the Interior Harrison Loesch, Senator Ted Stevens, and ɫƵ incorporators Elizabeth Beans, Paul Dixon, William Tyson, Fred Notti, Robert Nick and Phillip Guy. Dept of Interior / Ted Stevens Foundation photo.

July 1, 2024 update: ɫƵ Corporation appreciates . ɫƵ also took the position of no action, which ɫƵ advocated for earlier this year.

In 1971, Congress passed the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, authorizing the U.S. Department of the Interior to convey 45 million acres of land to 12 Alaska Native regional corporations and 200-plus village corporations.

However, despite hard work and good-faith efforts including the Alaska Land Transfer Acceleration Act of 2004, many village and regional corporations have not received their full entitlement.

Across Alaska, village corporations are still owed 636 square miles and regional corporations are still owed 1,360 square miles of their ANCSA entitlement, according to .

ɫƵ is still owed 330 square miles of its ANCSA subsurface entitlement, and 24 Village Corporations in the Region are still owed 109 square miles of their surface entitlement.

“The promises made over 50 years ago to resolve our Alaska Native land claims need to be honored,” says Tisha Kuhns, ɫƵ Vice President of Land and Natural Resources.

Section 17(d)(1) Impact on Land Selections

Meanwhile, the Interior Department is proposing to lift its ANCSA Section 17(d)(1) withdrawals throughout Alaska, including in the ɫƵ Region.

This would open these lands to State selection and mining claims, making them unavailable to ɫƵ and the Village Corporations to fulfill their entitlement, and potentially unavailable for other purposes that are important to our Shareholders.

ɫƵ submitted a comment letter to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management on its to revoke ANCSA 17(d)(1) withdrawals, stating that our preferred alternative is Alternative A, the no action alternative, which would keep the Section 17(d)(1) withdrawals.

“The promises made over 50 years ago to resolve our Alaska Native land claims need to be honored.”

Tisha Kuhns, ɫƵ Vice President of Land and Natural Resources

The BLM requested comments to be submitted by February 14. ɫƵ requested a 90-day comment period extension so that all 56 Tribes and 45 Village Corporations in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Region have ample time to provide meaningful comments.

A Record of Decision on the Final EIS is expected this summer.